Copying LE Hills

 

Dean Jessee - an awesome historian

 Dean Jessee has passed away. Dean was one of a handful of important, influential LDS historians who were a big influence on me. 

When I first delved into Church history with the research that led to my book The Lost City of Zarahemla, which among other things discussed the origin of the 1842 Times and Seasons articles that launched M2C, I met with Dean and showed him what I had discovered. He was enthusiastic and strongly encouraged me to keep working on Church history, which I did. He even wanted me to come teach his High Priests Quorum someday, but I had too many other Sunday commitments and never was able to do that.

Dean wanted to make original documents available to Latter-day Saints everywhere, which led to the Joseph Smith Papers. 

He was not interested in pursuing or promoting specific narratives the way so many other LDS historians do today.

_____

Here's an excellent article about Dean Jessee.

https://www.deseret.com/faith/2026/01/05/latter-day-saint-historian-dean-jessee-dies-joseph-smith-papers/

As the article notes, 

In the nearly 40 years Jessee then proceeded to work in the office and Church History Department, he published several works including a series of journal articles for BYU Studies, a book titled “The Personal Writings of Joseph Smith,” and two volumes of “The Papers of Joseph Smith.” These scholarly works were among the first published on Joseph Smith’s documents, Esplin said.

I still remember the day I was reading these books and saw, for the first time, the letter Joseph wrote to Emma that included this passage:

The whole of our journey, in the midst of so large a company of social honest men and sincere men, wandering over the plains of the Nephites, recounting occasionally the history of the Book of Mormon, roving over the mounds of that once beloved people of the Lord, picking up their skulls & their bones, as a proof of its divine authenticity...

https://www.josephsmithpapers.org/paper-summary/letterbook-2/62

I thought, why haven't I heard about this before?

And if Joseph Smith considered the mounds of Ohio, Indiana, and Illinois as "proof of the divine authenticity" of the Book of Mormon, why do modern LDS scholars reject what he said?

Those questions led me to do more research and eventually write Moroni's America.

Naturally, the M2Cers have a rationale for rejecting what Joseph wrote. They say he was merely speculating and he was wrong. Or else he was talking about the "hinterlands" of Book of Mormon events.

M2C is such a farce.

If more LDS historians and other intellectuals followed Dean Jessee's example of seeking truth instead of promoting narratives, Latter-day Saints around the world would be far better informed, less confused, and would share with Joseph Smith the realization that the setting of the Book of Mormon is proof of its divine authenticity.

Blessings to Dean's family.

Retrospective on President Holland

Let's start the year 2026 with a retrospective.

President Holland wrote his Masters Thesis in 1966 about the Book of Mormon. Among other things, he included comments about the translation. 

I found his thesis more useful and relevant than the Gospel Topics Essays and the writings of all the modern SITH scholars (SITH = stone-in-the-hat theory).

I posted comments about it here:

https://www.ldshistoricalnarratives.com/2026/01/president-hollands-masters-thesis-on.html

_____

:)

Gift ideas and other things to read

Due to heavy travel, I haven't posted for a while. I have some cool new stuff but I'll wait until January to post it.

In the meantime, here are my two favorite books of 2025.

Expressions of Jesus

Cultural Representations of the Savior of the World

https://www.deseretbook.com/product/6080309.html?cgid=books

The Rational Restoration: Reframes in the pursuit of clarity, charity and understanding.

Second Edition

https://www.amazon.com/Rational-Restoration-Jonathan-Neville/dp/1964978319

_____

When people email me with questions, I usually refer them to the Museum of the Book of Mormon (MOBOM) which has lots of resources:

https://www.mobom.org/

Those interested in art can see some great pieces at my art blog, here:

https://artandartistsonline.blogspot.com/

For a discussion of LDS historical narratives, go here:

https://www.ldshistoricalnarratives.com/

The Jonathan Edwards blog is here:

https://dailyjonathanedwards.blogspot.com/

The Zion blog is here:

https://howtozion.blogspot.com/

Most popular post and page

As of today, this blog has had 2,115,698 page views. 

The most popular post, both in the last year and overall, continues to be the one on "Simplicity" that I posted 9 years ago.

https://www.bookofmormoncentralamerica.com/2016/05/simplicity.html

In the ensuring years, not much has changed. 

Beliefs about the setting of the Book of Mormon still hinge on whether we accept or reject the teachings of the prophets about the New York Cumorah. Discussion of extrinsic evidence from archaeology, anthropology, geology, etc., as well as interpretations of the text, all derive from whether or not we accept or reject the New York Cumorah. 

That's how bias confirmation works, no matter how much people dress up their theories. 

That's why we can read Brant Gardner's work, or John Sorenson's, or any number of "Interpreters," and see the obvious bias confirmation at play. And I readily admit that my own views, explained in both editions of Moroni's America, reflect my own bias in favor of the teachings of the prophets.

Some people avoid this obvious point by directly rejecting what the prophets have taught. Some avoid it by ignoring Cumorah altogether (the way the Gospel Topics entry does). 

See https://www.ldshistoricalnarratives.com/p/book-of-mormon-geography-essay.html

And all of that is fine. People can believe whatever they want.

But every Latter-day Saint ought to make informed decisions, and no one can make an informed decision without knowing the facts.

In this case, at a minimum every Latter-day Saint should read Letter VII in his/her own language. This is why we are making it available in multiple languages soon. 

Along with the "Simplicity" post that continues to resonate.

_____

The most popular Page on this blog is the one that explain acronyms. The second most popular Page is a video. Thus, the most popular substantive Page is one that correlates to the "Simplicity" post.

https://www.bookofmormoncentralamerica.com/p/psychology-of-central-american-theory.html

This is a legacy Page posted before the shift away from the term "Mormon" and the changes to the Church website, etc. But it still works because it explains how confirmation bias has operated all these years.

_____

End of M2C and psychology

The pursuit of clarity, charity and understanding proceeds nicely for those who have an open mind, who value transparency, and who embrace the FAITH analysis, distinguishing Facts from Assumptions, Inferences, Theories and Hypotheses.

Another way to say it: If there is anything virtuous, lovely, or of good report or praiseworthy, we seek after these things.

Here's another way to express the value of flexibility in the pursuit of truth:

Monday, September 2. There is much folly, when I am quite sure I am in the right, and others are positive in contradicting me, in entering into a vehement or long debate upon it. 

Monday, September 23. I observe that old men seldom have any advantage of new discoveries; because these are beside a way of thinking they have been so long used to. Resolved, if ever I live to years, that I will be impartial to hear the reasons of all pretended discoveries, and receive them, if rational, how long soever I have been used to another way of thinking.

Monday, Feb. 3. Let every thing have the value now, that it will have on a sick bed; and frequently in my pursuits of whatever kind, let this come into my mind; “How much shall I value this on my deathbed?” 

D&C 132

This topic of Section 132 relates to the Come Follow Me lesson. I posted comments on lds historical narratives here:

https://www.ldshistoricalnarratives.com/2025/11/corroborating-josephs-production-of-d.html

Somewhat related to the origin and setting of the Book of Mormon, I did a review of another Interpreter article, this one on D&C 132, here:

https://interpreterpeerreviews.blogspot.com/2025/11/more-stylometry-d-132.html

Let's all hope that at some point, LDS scholars will focus on what Joseph and Oliver said about the origin and setting of the Book of Mormon, not what their detractors claimed.

And definitely not what certain modern scholars think, especially those who claim to know more than Joseph and Oliver did about those topics.

:)